January 24, 2008

true or false?

a man is never a man until he's had a woman ...

i'll leave it up to the reader to decide what the word had means ...

4 comments:

Dreamer said...

Hmmm..interestiiiiiiing!!

Yeah..i'm leaning towards agreeing with that!

Jundi said...

hehe .. well it started out as a post about how a man could be a man in every aspect of manhood .. his build, confidence, strength, appearance, etc .. he could be hercules .. but if he doesn't have a woman then he still won't feel like a man despite it all .. then i deleted the post and shortened it to one sentence :D

but how do you define "had"?
o_O

Dreamer said...

Yes yes i agree with you, the same goes for a woman of course. She could be venus herself but if she hadn't had a man then her womanhood will be incomplete. Having a woman is experiencing her, both emotionally and physically and I think one experience leads naturally to the other! AAAAAAAAAAnd don't give me that confused look..mr devil :p

queenie said...

I think it's a comparative thing. So a man is a "man" in relation to what? In relation to a woman. In a sense, the definitions of both genders rely on the existence of the other.

Btw, thanks for the b-day wishes! I have yet to get to all those wall posts :S